Okay - so astronomers are getting close. Up until the mid-1990s, we did not have any confirmed detection of planets outside our Solar system. And now the number is close to 500 planets (and in the mean time we even managed to take away the planetary status of one of our own planets. Pluto is still a planet, Dammit! :) ). But then all of the detections were of planets much bigger than the Earth, with most of them orbiting close to their parent stars (this was mostly the consequence of the wobble detection technique being used - the parent star wobbles because of the tug from a big planet, orbiting close by).
Now astronomers have detected a planet, Gliese 581g, only three times the mass of the Earth and located smack in the middle of the habitable zone. Habitable zone only means that the planet is orbiting at a distance where water can potentially exist in liquid form. And water, we think, is essential for life.
Very cool! We are not talking about any intelligent lifeforms here - but simply the potential of simple life (though, of course, it would be absolutely amazing if there was complex life there - but we can't say any thing about it from the information we have).
Couple of quick things: This is the sixth planet discovered orbiting the star Gliese 581 (yes, such names are very sexy for astronomers) - in fact this is the most planets discovered (so far) around a star other than the Sun. Gliese 581 is located only 20 light years form us or about 200 trillion kms (crap - it sounds much closer in light years - so lets stick with that).
But here is the cool thing (literally). Gliese 581 is a red dwarf - which means that it is relatively cooler than the Sun (couple of thousand degrees on the surface, versus 6000 degrees for the Sun). The newly discovered planet, Gliese 581g, is quite close to its parent star and it takes only 37 days to make one full orbit. One consequence of this is that the planet is tidally-locked with its star - i.e. the same side of the planet always faces the star and the other star never sees any light from the star (our Moon is tidally locked with the Earth - this is the reason we only see the same side of the Moon from the Earth - and thus Pink Floyd could come up with their cool album name).
Here is a schematic of the habitable zone before the discovery of Gliese 581g. It would sit smack in between the planets c and d:
So can there be life on a planet - where there is perpetual light on one side and perpetual darkness on the other? Very hot on one side and very cold on the other. We don't know (yet). Some have speculated that the border between the shadow and light may be a good place for life to originate and evolve. One can also imagine local terrestrial features, such as mountains, cracks, or crevices that may shield organisms from the blazing heat and may provide a suitable environment to thrive.
Okay, we'll have to eventually take a field trip there. But this is certainly the first of many planets discovered that will be good candidates for hosting other lifeforms.
Read the press release here and a story from the Washington Post here. If you are interested in Gliese 581, you can more information here.
What is Irtiqa?
Irtiqa is Salman Hameed's blog. A few years ago (before Facebook killed many of the blogs), it used to track stories of science & religion, especially those related to Muslim societies. That is still one of its foci, but now it dovetails more of Salman's interests including film, astronomy, science fiction, and science outreach in both Pakistan and the US.
Irtiqa literally means evolution in Urdu. But it does not imply only biological evolution. Instead, it is an all encompassing word used for evolution of the universe, biological evolution, and also for biological/human development. While it has created confusion in debates over biological evolution in South Asia, it provides a nice integrative name for this blog. For further information, contact Salman Hameed.
The blog banner is designed by Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad. You can find all his creative endeavors at Orangie.
Salman Hameed
Salman is an astronomer and Associate Professor of Integrated Science & Humanities at Hampshire College, Massachusetts. Currently, he is working on understanding the rise of creationism in contemporary Islamic world and how Muslims view the relationship between science & religion. He is also working with historian Tracy Leavelle at Creighton University to analyze reconciliation efforts between astronomers and Native Hawaiians over telescopes on top of sacred Mauna Kea in Hawaii. He teaches “History and Philosophy of Science & Religion” with philosopher Laura Sizer, and “Science in the Islamic World”, both at Hampshire College. Salman and Laura Sizer are also responsible for the ongoing Hampshire College Lecture Series on Science & Religion, and you can find videos of all these lectures below. Contact information here.
LABELS
- Arab Spring
- art
- Astronomy
- Astronomy Pictures from Pakistan
- atheism
- beliefs of scientists
- Catholic Church and science
- creationism
- education
- education in muslim world
- ethics morality and science
- evolution
- faith and medicine
- film theater and television
- Friday Journal Club
- general
- history
- humor
- intelligent design
- Irtiqa Conversations
- Islam and Modernity
- islam and science
- Islamic Calendar
- islamic creationism
- Judaism and science
- media
- Muslims in Europe
- off topic
- Pakistan
- politics of science and religion
- posts by Nidhal Guessoum
- primates
- pseudoscience
- religion and environmentalism
- Religion and Health
- Religion and Technology
- Saturday Video
- science and Native religions
- science and religion books
- science fiction
- science in muslim world
- science of belief
- science of morality
- science religion and terrorism
- UFO religions
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(309)
-
▼
September
(23)
- Gliese 581g: An extrasolar planet sitting in a "ha...
- Restrepo: An unflinching look at the Afghan war
- Is money the answer for universities? The Pakistan...
- Students in the Arab World Today
- How do students at elite Pakistani universities vi...
- Lunacy still reigns at the Texas Board of Education
- The Daily Show on Religious Conflict
- "Gorillas and God" - Science & Religion Lecture on...
- Muslim Humanoid Robots
- A new book on Al-Kindi's works
- Lynchings in 21st century?
- On Roswell and the Moon Landing Hoax
- IMANA ethics symposium at Hofstra University
- God, the Universe, and French Scientists
- Poverty and Religiosity
- The Simpsons on PhDs and grad students
- Creationism at 35,000 feet
- A New Yorker article on Francis Collins
- The eye of the (religious/atheist) beholder
- Hawking, God, and the Universe
- Off-topic: A smart New Yorker piece on Pakistan
- Astronomy and World Heritage
- Conservapedia on "Counterexamples to Relativity"
-
▼
September
(23)
6 comments:
hm thats intersting.
Is it necessary the parameters which we think are important for life are same for all the forms in the universe? May be the requirement of life over there or at any other planet is not water, light etc. Universe is far more vast than our imagination. Anything is possible
If a planet has an atmosphere, I think tidal locking should not be a huge problem, as atmospheric tides due to temperature difference (and pressure diference as a result) should result in massive atmospheric current shifts maintaining an equillibrium. Like on Venus, where temperatures and pressures are same all over the planet, from poles to equator and from day side to night side (A day is longer than a year on Venus). Again extremophiles on Earth display remarkable ability to sustain in harsh and seemingly impossible 'alien-like' environments.
(...sorry to comment was left in the middle as I had to rush to the theatre, one case after another).
Right, talking of extremophiles, thay are everywhere on Earth, from the deep trenches of Pacific Ocean, where pressures are far more crushing than on Venus, High up in the clouds in very low temperature, pressure, and high radiations, in volcanic vents in oceans with temperatures in excess of 120 degrees, dessicating chemical pools of sulphur in Yellow Stone NP, and miles under the ice sheets of Antarctica with no sunlight. I am a big fan of Tardigrades too who survived vacuum of space for months. Inshort, life is everywhere on Earth from poles to equator, from ocean depths to the top of high clouds, from freezing glaciers to boiling pools. The only places which are devoid of virtually any life are a few sterile patches in Atacama Desert that lack any trace of moisture...presence or absence of water makes real difference.
Now the presence of life is one thing, and the origin of it is another. Take a few tardigrades and some tough algae and bacteria to Gliese planet system, and the planets will be teaming with life (of course with a different ecosystem). But I still don't get over the odds involved in the creation of a simple prokaryotic cell, which is still much more complex than anything you can think or name.
Anon:
Oh absolutely. Life can be in a form that we currently cannot imagine. However, we have to start with places/environments for which we know life exists - at least the one we know.
Akbar,
The possibility of a thick atmosphere is a great point - and that will indeed modulate the temperature differences to a certain degree. Also, because of the larger mass Gliese518g, there is also an increases likelihood of it retaining an atmosphere (because of increased gravity). Though too much atmosphere - and we run into a runaway greenhouse effect...
Interesting post Salman.
Discoveries such as this one makes me happy and they make me sad too.
Happy because it obviously gives us the impression we can abndon the Earth should the need arise. Sad because I realise this is such a false impression. Nevertheless, it is an excitement for everyone and I am sure a bigger one for the astronomers (who also teach evolution?).
Can a planet that is tidally locked with its sun even harbour an atmosphere? This question have been lingering in my mind ever since I saw Akbar's first comment here. So thought might as well ask.
Hi Akbar,
"But I still don't get over the odds involved in the creation of a simple prokaryotic cell, which is still much more complex than anything you can think or name."
Well, panspermia (if the word can be used for planets other than the Earth) on Gleise 581g is always an option. And we also know that there is more than one variety that we can choose from for this purpose.
If inhabitants are already there at Gliese 581g, we can even start an exchange programme. Any volunteers?
Ali:
Good thought about presence or absence of atmosphere on a planet that is tidally locked. I think most likely all the atmosphere will freeze and snow down on the night side of a tidally locked body. and the the planet would have been stripped off of an atmosphere altogether. The case for Venus is surely different in this case.
Perhaps we can dream about Earth or Mars sized moons orbiting a tidally locked gas giants in habitable zone circling Gliese581. Even though the moons may themeselves be tidally locked to the parent planet, but they will get equal cycles of day and night all over the surface, just like Jupiter's moons.
About creation of even the simplest (yet incredibly complex) prokaryotic cell, did you notice that I deliberately omitted the word 'Earth' for a purpose?
Post a Comment