The Global Science Program for Security, Competitiveness and Diplomacy Act, co-sponsored in March by Berman and Jeff Fortenberry, a Republican from Nebraska, would provide grants of up to five years to universities and businesses and fund infrastructure for research in a number of specific fields, including multi–drug-resistant and water-borne diseases, renewable energy and nuclear nonproliferation, among others. Research into sensitive subjects such as bioterrorism and select agents would not be funded. The bill, which does not specify a budget, also aims to create a 'global virtual science library' that would make scientific journals available at little to no cost.Ahmed Zewail, an Egyptian-born chemist at the California Institute of Technology and a member on the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, applauds the legislation. “This is about creating the infrastructure, exchanges and management” in science between the US and the Muslim world, says Zewail, who was one of three science envoys appointed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in November.
Still, he concedes that some countries in the region do not have the capacity to support research, even if paid for by US taxpayers. “Some countries are at different levels,” he says. “Some will only be able to contribute human resources,” but others should produce concrete results.
Read the full story here. This bill is in its early stages and has to first go through the foreign affairs committee as well the relevant science committees of both the House and the Senate, before it can be brought up for a vote in the respective chamber of the Congress.
6 comments:
You're right to harp on the importance of the pure science to challenge their beliefs, and appreciate the scientific method.
I would like to add that they need to teach those things much earlier; as early as possible. They could also foster an educational environment that encourages debate. Muslims are not used to supporting their arguments with facts, so maybe these universities could teach some basic critical thinking skills that the students should have acquired in secondary school but didn't.
Are there any Muslim biologists who completely believe in evolution?
Emre: Critical thinking is absolutely a must. I would also add a sense of wonder and curiosity.
Anonymous:
Just like other places, there is a broad spectrum in the ways Muslims accept or reject evolution. There are many Muslim medical doctors who have no problem with evolution (but many reject it also). We are, in fact, currently conducting a study on the way Muslim medical doctors negotiate evolution. Will share the results when we finish our work - hopefully by the summer of 2011.
Dear Nitin,
I will be happy to buy some medical supplies. Do you sell mint-flavored condoms?
Emre.
I am a Muslim medical doctor. I find Darwin's Theory unconvincing. Natural selection is not God. But the theory of evolution expects it to play God.
Dear doctor,
The theory of evolution very much does not expect natural selection to play god. The absence of an omnipotent being guiding the process is very much a selling point.
It's a bit like trying to describe why objects fall without the theory of gravity. Maybe god is upset that the objects are trying to reach his heavenly heights and he smacks them down to earth? Or maybe there is a simpler explanation.
Post a Comment