Here is a fascinating Fresh Air interview with David Hoffman. He is the author of The Dead Hand: The Untold Story of the Cold War and its Dangerous Legacy. Interestingly, he paints Reagan as a guy who wanted to make nuclear weapons obsolete - part of the rationale for his Star Wars program. Now this is an intriguing twist to Reagan and I'm still not sure if I buy it completely. It may also represent an evolution of Reagan from his early days to the his second term as President. However, it is clear that Reagan was indeed rattled by the made-for-TV movie The Day After - that imagined the impact of a nuclear attack on Lawrence, Kansas and Kansas City, Missouri. If you don't have time to listen to the whole interview, check out this part of the interview that starts around 28-29 minutes in. From a different perspective, this is an amazing demonstration of the enormous impact television can make (I can also testify to it personally as I decided to pursue astronomy after watching the first episode of Cosmos, when it first aired in Pakistan in 1984). Talking of Sagan, Hoffman's view adds an interesting irony to the anti-nuclear protests in the 1980s. At one point Reagan invited Sagan to a dinner at the White House, but Sagan declined the invitation - partly because of Reagan's Star Wars program. But may be they would have agreed on something. In any case, Reagan did end up borrowing Sagan's aliens. Check out this segment of Reagan's 1987 speech to the UN:
More likely, both Sagan and Reagan were influenced by the story from a 1963 episode of The Outer Limits titled, The Architects of Fear. Watch the full episode here.
As much as I dislike the Reagan years, I could actually believe that Reagan did genuinely want to abolish nuclear weapons. Unfortunately the implementation of the SDI program was unilateral and very destabilizing. The Soviet response was entirely rational in that regard (and so, by the way, is the Russian response currently).
But Reagan was working against history and inertia to some extent -- the MX Peacekeeper was brought online during Reagan's watch, but the program started under Nixon and advanced rapidly under Carter and the early Reagan years. So I don't totally blame him for MX.
And it's also possible he and others in his administration were sufficiently spooked by the Soviet response to NATO exercises in late 1983 that they decided it wasn't worth it anymore. (See this for more on that latter point.)
But hearing the Christian right wing talking about the "End Times" in the 1980s was a little scary...
"The Soviet response was entirely rational in that regard (and so, by the way, is the Russian response currently)."
Commie! :)
Actually, good point about the MX. But did he really have to bring it online? But, yes, his thinking may have evolved quite a bit in his 8 years in office - especially in 1983.
No, he didn't have to roll out the MX, but unfortunately the Soviets had already responded to US missile development in the 1970s (including the upcoming rollout of the Trident fleet in 1981) with a huge buildup in the late 1970s.
(By the way, Vladimir Putin is about as "Communist" as Dick Cheney....)
Irtiqa is Salman Hameed's blog. A few years ago (before Facebook killed many of the blogs), it used to track stories of science & religion, especially those related to Muslim societies. That is still one of its foci, but now it dovetails more of Salman's interests including film, astronomy, science fiction, and science outreach in both Pakistan and the US.
Irtiqa literally means evolution in Urdu. But it does not imply only biological evolution. Instead, it is an all encompassing word used for evolution of the universe, biological evolution, and also for biological/human development. While it has created confusion in debates over biological evolution in South Asia, it provides a nice integrative name for this blog. For further information, contact Salman Hameed.
The blog banner is designed by Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad. You can find all his creative endeavors at Orangie.
Salman Hameed
Salman is an astronomer and Associate Professor of Integrated Science & Humanities at Hampshire College, Massachusetts. Currently, he is working on understanding the rise of creationism in contemporary Islamic world and how Muslims view the relationship between science & religion. He is also working with historian Tracy Leavelle at Creighton University to analyze reconciliation efforts between astronomers and Native Hawaiians over telescopes on top of sacred Mauna Kea in Hawaii. He teaches “History and Philosophy of Science & Religion” with philosopher Laura Sizer, and “Science in the Islamic World”, both at Hampshire College. Salman and Laura Sizer are also responsible for the ongoing Hampshire College Lecture Series on Science & Religion, and you can find videos of all these lectures below. Contact information here.
3 comments:
As much as I dislike the Reagan years, I could actually believe that Reagan did genuinely want to abolish nuclear weapons. Unfortunately the implementation of the SDI program was unilateral and very destabilizing. The Soviet response was entirely rational in that regard (and so, by the way, is the Russian response currently).
But Reagan was working against history and inertia to some extent -- the MX Peacekeeper was brought online during Reagan's watch, but the program started under Nixon and advanced rapidly under Carter and the early Reagan years. So I don't totally blame him for MX.
And it's also possible he and others in his administration were sufficiently spooked by the Soviet response to NATO exercises in late 1983 that they decided it wasn't worth it anymore. (See this for more on that latter point.)
But hearing the Christian right wing talking about the "End Times" in the 1980s was a little scary...
"The Soviet response was entirely rational in that regard (and so, by the way, is the Russian response currently)."
Commie! :)
Actually, good point about the MX. But did he really have to bring it online? But, yes, his thinking may have evolved quite a bit in his 8 years in office - especially in 1983.
No, he didn't have to roll out the MX, but unfortunately the Soviets had already responded to US missile development in the 1970s (including the upcoming rollout of the Trident fleet in 1981) with a huge buildup in the late 1970s.
(By the way, Vladimir Putin is about as "Communist" as Dick Cheney....)
Post a Comment